Was Nathan an Other?
December 19th 2006 18:50
Every so often, I receive a question about whether Nathan was an Other. Nathan was only in one episode, "The Other 48 Days", in season two. He was the one the tail section survivors put in the pit. Ana-Lucia said he came out of the jungle dry right after the plane crash and he spent hours alone in the jungle. Cindy (stewardess) couldn't remember seeing him on flight 815. Bernard and Libby thought he seemed suspicious. Eko was in his forty days of repentance and couldn't speak.
Goodwin, who really was an Other, said nothing. To me, this says a lot about the Others and the way they operate. He could have used that moment to sow more suspicion in that very paranoid group, but he didn't. He let them come to their own conclusions. He watched and observed.
So, Ana-Lucia dug the pit and threw Nathan in there. Goodwin worried that Nathan would convince Ana-Lucia that he was innocent, thus throwing suspicion on--well, the group was so paranoid that suspicion could have gone to anyone. Goodwin worried they would turn against him, so he killed Nathan in the middle of the night.
The question still remains: Was Goodwin killing one of his own compatriots to save himself? Or was he just doing away with one of those people who weren't "good" (because they don't really matter and are expendable in his view)?
Nathan was not an Other. He was one of the tail section survivors. Gregg Nations, script coordinator for Lost, answered the question definitively at the Fuselage. The link will be invalid within about a week, so if you want to double-check me, hurry.
Goodwin, who really was an Other, said nothing. To me, this says a lot about the Others and the way they operate. He could have used that moment to sow more suspicion in that very paranoid group, but he didn't. He let them come to their own conclusions. He watched and observed.
So, Ana-Lucia dug the pit and threw Nathan in there. Goodwin worried that Nathan would convince Ana-Lucia that he was innocent, thus throwing suspicion on--well, the group was so paranoid that suspicion could have gone to anyone. Goodwin worried they would turn against him, so he killed Nathan in the middle of the night.
The question still remains: Was Goodwin killing one of his own compatriots to save himself? Or was he just doing away with one of those people who weren't "good" (because they don't really matter and are expendable in his view)?
Nathan was not an Other. He was one of the tail section survivors. Gregg Nations, script coordinator for Lost, answered the question definitively at the Fuselage. The link will be invalid within about a week, so if you want to double-check me, hurry.
| 60 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog








Comment by The Daily Sonnet
The Daily Sonnet
Lots of Sonnets
Comment by katyzzz
Photography Tips
MS Paint Art
You must have to have eyes in the back of your head.
katyzzz
Comment by Adele
Lost Fanatic
Day Break TV
I thought it was clear at the time. I think what is confusing to some people is the great lengths that the writers went to parallel Nathan and Ethan, right down to similar names. They were both from Canada. They both knew how to track and set traps. They're both big, dark-haired guys.
Goodwin said of Nathan, "He wasn't good. That's why he wasn't on the list." To me, that says he wasn't an Other, but I think some people think that just means he wasn't "good", whatever that means.
Well, rumors are flying about Lost coming back early because Day Break was cancelled. I can't find out anything official.
Comment by Adele
Lost Fanatic
Day Break TV
Just stuff I happen to run across in my daily surf. It's lots of fun.
Comment by The Daily Sonnet
The Daily Sonnet
Lots of Sonnets
I started watching Lost after Ethan was on it, although I did hear a lot about there being a "bad guy" named Ethan because that's my name in real life.
Comment by Adele
Lost Fanatic
Day Break TV
Yes, Ethan was an evil Canadian. According to the show's producers, they like evil Canadians.